Is mac safer than windows 7
Ten years ago, when Windows gained a bad reputation for security, Microsoft responded by introducing its Trustworthy Computing Initiative. However, Microsoft took a long look at the threat and made a conscious effort to evolve their operating systems to counter it. Initially, one of the biggest threats was considered by Microsoft to be buffer overflow. This is where regions of computer memory that should not be used for executing code are misused by rogue software.
As well as preventing developers inadvertently building this into their applications by adding safeguards to the compilers, Microsoft also introduced memory protection mechanisms within their operating systems. For example, since Vista was introduced in , Windows has had address space layout randomisation ASLR which is implemented so as to obscure most of what an attacker needs to conduct, for example, shell code injection attacks.
I think what all of this exemplifies is two populations of users Mac OS and Windows that have developed very different attitudes to security. Those using Windows have been aware for a long time that their systems have vulnerabilities, and so they are much more likely to use some form of protection such as anti-virus software. Windows users also typically update their software when an update is released by Microsoft; they know updates mean that vulnerabilities may have been found, and it is safer to update than be exposed.
Those using Mac OS have, perhaps, been lulled into a false sense of security. A Mac OS user is less likely to be attacked than a Windows user, but that is nothing to do with the level of vulnerability in the operating system. Those building malware would rather attack the vast majority of the users. They get a bigger bang for their buck, to borrow a phrase from the military. Apple has its part to play by releasing updates rapidly in response to known vulnerabilities, and users need to make sure they implement those updates as well as installing security software to protect against the coming threat.
Image credit: Follow NakedSecurity on Twitter for the latest computer security news. Macs safer, no. Having said that in the last 20 years of using a Mac I have been infected 0 times had 0 malware installed and feel safe. When running a competing product, it never found anything on my system. There were numerous reasons that it exposed me to potentially more vulnerabilities than it could have ever found. By default am antivirus system must download and install updates. It will generally do that silently to avoid constantly nagging the user.
At that point you are trusting the security measures of the vendor to protect your system from infection through their software. Anti virus software is a personal choice and not always needed. The performance hit from most as well as the way they prevent real work from occurring at times leads me to believe I can rebuild my system once every 2 years with less disruption than installing AV software. Never, ever use your own example of being virus-less for X years as a proof your system is secure.
I have run windows 95 without anti virus for more than 10 years without virus of any kind. It was evidently only because I was prudent, as when my father get the same computer, the system became infected beyond repair in less than ten minutes. Most of the time the anti-malware program has not stopped the infection and cannot remove it though Malwarbytes is pretty good in this respect, but not infallible.
HOW is this situation better than Mac users thinking they don't need protection??? In both cases the user lives with a false sense of security but in the Windows case they have paid for it. So what I am getting out of this is the best combination is your computer being a Mac and your user being intelligent and diligent about putting antivirus and updates on their machine. That gives you an OS that is targeted less frequently and a user that knows they are not invincible and updates their machine and AV software regularly.
I have nothing against Windows PCs as I have to use them every day, it's because of that I know how unrelenting the updates and patches are: You are getting it wrong dumbass. Macs also have viruses. It's actually more or less because PCs have the market share that the viruses target them. But don't worry my dear little Mac fanboy, you're getting yours. People are eating up that supply of Macs, along with the supply of B.
Is Mac OS X Truly More Secure than Windows?
Apple feeds you. You know what that means, right? Yeah, you're now worth targeting since there are enough of you. But here's the kicker my friend, the part that makes it the sweetest for me, Apple products are considered "Status Symbols," because they're so over-priced, so all the more reason to attack you, you have more money to steal. Wow, Sophos continues its "scare the mac users into buying unecessary security software " campaign. I loved the bit about "backdoor Trojan embedded inside boobytrapped Word documents "! This most recent Mac Flashplayer virus was therefore still technically a zero day attack no patch available on Macs, 42 days after the vulnerability was patched on "buggy and insecure" Windows.
Apple originally did their own JVM when Sun basically told them it was not worth their effort to support the platform. Perhaps the two parties should get together and remedy this situation.
- virus - Is Mac OSX really more secure than Windows - Information Security Stack Exchange.
- skype werkt niet op mac.
- Why Not Watch?.
- Why Does Security Matter?.
- Post navigation;
Yes, because Sophos really are trying to get people to buy their software. Their free software. Their software that they give away for free. That they don't in fact sell at all. That makes perfect sense. Certainly more sense than the idea your beloved fanboi OS could have any security issues. The "free"software is a classic bait lol. Certainly my beloved OS has lots of security issues, but it is beloved because it works reliably and is easy to use. It is of course peoples perrogative to stick their head in the sand and ignore the warnings from Sophos who, you could legitimately argue have a potential vested interest in scaring MAC users although their MAC AV product is presently free for home use!
However, there are similar warnings coming from many other independent sources and many incidents being reported to support the proliferation of MAC attacks. It is my understanding that MACs are definitely now becoming a focus of attention for the authors of malware exactly because they know that they are surrounded by this invulnerability culture and often left unprotected and so they can use them as carriers to inject malware into networks and other systems. By being in denial, I feel you potentially put others as well as yourself at risk.
I will not dispute the merits of MACs over PCs especially in the area of security but neither they nor Apple are perfect and I strongly recommend all MAC users to start taking this issue seriously. Ha finally someone is talking about the insecurities of the Apple OS, how safe can you be if you leave your house unlocked? Even if there are no known thieves in the area?
Three weeks ago I looked at a clients personal Mac, infected files, she was very surprised and said "but Macs don't have viruses" A very expensive mistake. I still dispair at the number of people who ignore simple security basics, regardless of the OS you use, you should have a decent AV system. There are no decent AV systems though.
The performance of AV systems is dismal. You didn't mention what the files were infected with. What was it? I bought a new PC and went online without virus protection.
Let’s Define the Problem
In less than 1 hour I was infected by a malicious site. I would never keep a computer — whether Mac or Windows — without virus protection. To do so is to play roulette. Have to agree with City-Support — although he omits to say whether the infected files had windows viruses in them which would not affect his client's Mac!
Have used Sophos for about 15 years on a mixed Mac and PC network we are a Printer and have not had an issue. Even Mr Cluley's occasional barbed stabs at Macs have only been mildly irritating when it is obvious that not running a "decent AV system" in a business environment is just plain stupid. Like G Dean, the "charms" of MicroSoft elude me, but as long as the machines are protected and the only worry is the convoluted logic behind the operating system — I can live with them — albeit with having to pay for "professional" help which is not needed on the Macs.
Mac OSX is just as vulnuerable, and this latest Trojan proves that. On my MacBook I have auto log on disabled, and I have the firewall enabled and stealth mode on. I also have Sophos Anti-Virus installed on my Mac for protection. I do checks for updates at least once a week, and I keep Sophos Anti-Virus updated. Patching any vulnerabilities will ensure that such drive-by attacks will be nullified. However, keep in mind that nothing is perfect, so be very careful of which websites you go to.
You sound just like what PC people went through 10 years ago.
I'm glad there is a reasonably minded, logical Mac person. People hack in CIA, DOD, Pentagon computers routinely and, amazingly, there are plenty of Mac user hang onto this notion that Macs "safer" and that "it doesn't get viruses" etc. I was just speaking person working for one of our govt departments and despite incredibly sophisticated computer security, almost every single one of the computers have been hacked.
Wake up Mac users. Incidentally I also have a laptop with I take it you mean Alan Woodward. I should have used a different name. Anyway, I take a go at answering. Thank you for responding, Alan.
Are Macs safer than PCs? – Naked Security
See http: IMO, mac owners should be very concerned. NT was wriiten from the ground up by Dave Cutler who was hired away from Digital. The first version was releaseed in mid So they Windows XP inherited users, software and developers that assumed admin rights i. Recent versions of Windows have been attempts to force third-party developers to write code that will run in standard user rights and wean windows users of their admin rights addiction.
Microsoft also implemented the Security Development Lifecycle program to train developers their own and third-party to bake security into the software development process from the very start. This was one of the main innovations to come out the trusworthy computing initiative. Think most people developing apps for iOS and Android give a second thought about security?
Think again. Same goes for web developers. Microsoft does provide a tool to manually force such apps to use it along with other types of memory protection. So with this in mind, which computer system, Mac or PC, will keep your information better protected from external threats?
Also, when we discuss security threats, we are focusing primarily on virus and malware attacks. With those specifics in place, which system is safer? I would have to put my money on OS X right now. You may remember almost a decade ago when Apple started its Get A Mac campaign. It focused on the key benefits of owning an Apple machine over a traditional Windows computer, in the hopes of converting people to Mac. One of the ads alluded to the fact that Windows machines were more likely be infected with viruses than their Mac counterparts.
Many interpreted this as Macs being invulnerable to viruses and malware. This, of course, is far from the truth. More recently, there was the Mac Flashback trojan. Well, despite these specific examples, there are far more viruses and malware that target Windows machines than any other system. If you were a hacker, and were creating a virus or malware to target as many machines as possible and cause widespread attacks, you would focus your efforts on what will create the greatest return.
This idea is further reinforced in the mobile market.